Identify each writer's position clearly
Before answering, summarize: "The article argues X. The commenter agrees/disagrees because Y." This prevents mixing up whose view you're asked about.
CELPIP
Strategies
An article plus reader comments. You separate each view and weigh the argument.
10 questions · 12 min
Before answering, summarize: "The article argues X. The commenter agrees/disagrees because Y." This prevents mixing up whose view you're asked about.
Some questions ask about the overall position; others ask about a specific example. Know which type you're answering.
If the commenter disagrees with the article, the blank will contain words that express opposition, alternatives, or criticism.
With 12 minutes for 10 questions, you have just over a minute per question. Read efficiently but don't rush.
The debate over requiring financial literacy courses in high schools is gaining momentum across Canada, as educators, parents, and financial experts weigh in on the best approach to preparing young people for the financial realities of adulthood.
Dr. Anya Sharma, a professor of education policy at the University of Toronto, is a strong advocate for making these courses mandatory. "Financial literacy is not just about balancing a checkbook," she argues. "It's about empowering young people to make informed decisions about student loans, credit cards, investing, and saving for the future. These are fundamental life skills that every student deserves to learn before graduating."
However, not everyone agrees. Michael Chen, a high school principal in Calgary, warns that adding another required course could overwhelm an already demanding academic schedule. "Our students are already stretched thin," he explains. "We need to think carefully about what we add and what we're willing to take away."